![]() Big one would probably be an accusation that it tends towards anarchism, and a lack of control from the state. Liberationist theory most certainly has it's positives, but to know an ideology well, one needs to know the common weaknesses that are attacked by it's detractors. Really, to have a good chance of success would require grassroots support from the populace of Japan. It would likely see far more organized resistance at this point. On the flipside of that coin however, Destro's attempted revolution was before the hero system had been properly established. That's actually very very interesting to consider. With the Pale having surrounded Japan, there is no possibility of an intervention from abroad, which does make things rather more interesting.Ĭlick to shrink.Huh. If you're oh, a humarise terrorist who thinks everything is going to hell anyway, or are just a warlord who is convinced of their personal power and invincibility, and just want to tear down the old order, and you know that there will be no backup from an international coalition or such to punish you if you step out of line, well.Įdit: Though, now that we're on this line of discussion, the original Destro's revolution was only defeated by an international hero coalition. If you're something like an organization that wants to at least give lip service to something beyond might makes right and anything goes (especially if you want 'legitimacy', 'tradition', or such - aka, you don't want someone getting the idea that they can just come in and do whatever to you just because they can), then yes, certainly, you have an interest in fair play. It's really a matter of what ends you seek, and what ends are precluded by what means. Well, certainly! The rules, as they are, tend to exist out of pragmatism, after all, not (just) out of ideals or appeals to one's better nature.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |